계약 공장

SmartPy https://medium.com/@SmartPy_io/introducing-smartpy-and-smartpy-io-d4013bee7d4e#15ee

아이디어는big_map을 보유하고big_map의 각 요소가 계약을 나타내는 계약을 갖는 것입니다.

이것은 SmartPy에만 국한되지 않으며 Michelson,Liquidity 또는 Fi에서 직접 수행 할 수 있습니다.

이 주제는 여기에도 나타났습니다. BigMap 컨테이너 란 무엇이며 중요한 이유?

There is a very succinct discussion in the announcement for SmartPy https://medium.com/@SmartPy_io/introducing-smartpy-and-smartpy-io-d4013bee7d4e#15ee.

The idea is to have a contract that holds a big_map and each element of the big_map represents a contract.

This is absolutely not restricted to SmartPy and it is directly doable in Michelson, Liquidity or Fi.

This subject also appeared here: What is the BigMap container and why does it matter?

다음은 유동성에서이를 처리하는 계약의 예입니다. 실행이 끝날 때만 원격 프로 시저 호출을 활용할 수있는 함수를 작성하는 고유 한 과제가 있습니다.

 type plus_storage = {
    count: nat,
    plus_owner: address,
  };

contract PlusOne = {
  type storage = plus_storage;
  let%init storage = (y: nat) => {
    count: y,
    plus_owner: Current.sender(),
  };
  let%entry main = (p: nat, storage) => {
    if (Current.sender() != storage.plus_owner) {
      failwith("invalid caller");
    };
    ([], storage);
  }
};

type storage = {
  owner: key,
  pl: address,
};

let%init storage = (contract_owner: key) => {
  owner: contract_owner,
  pl: KT1111111111111111111111111111111111,
}

let%entry other = (param: nat, storage) => {
  let t: option(PlusOne.instance) = Contract.at(storage.pl);
  let t = switch(t) {
    | None => Current.failwith()
    | Some(inst) => inst
  };
  let op = Contract.call(
    ~dest=t,
    ~amount=0tz,
    ~entry=main,
    ~parameter=param);
  ([op], storage);
};

let%entry main = ((), storage) => {
  let manager = Crypto.hash_key(storage.owner);
  let delegate = Some(manager);
  let spendable = false;
  let amount = Current.amount();
  let init_value: nat = 0;

  let (c_op, c_addr) =
    Contract.create(
      ~manager,
      ~delegate,
      ~spendable,
      ~delegatable=false,
      ~amount,
      ~storage={count: init_value, plus_owner: Contract.address(Contract.self())},
      (contract PlusOne),
    );

  let storage = storage.pl = c_addr;
  ([c_op], storage);
};
 

이것이 "주문"및 "픽업"과 같은 종점,즉 레스토랑으로 이어질지 궁금합니다.

Here's an example of a contract handling this in liquidity. There's the unique challenge of writing functions that can only utilize remote procedure calls at the end of their execution:

type plus_storage = {
    count: nat,
    plus_owner: address,
  };

contract PlusOne = {
  type storage = plus_storage;
  let%init storage = (y: nat) => {
    count: y,
    plus_owner: Current.sender(),
  };
  let%entry main = (p: nat, storage) => {
    if (Current.sender() != storage.plus_owner) {
      failwith("invalid caller");
    };
    ([], storage);
  }
};

type storage = {
  owner: key,
  pl: address,
};

let%init storage = (contract_owner: key) => {
  owner: contract_owner,
  pl: KT1111111111111111111111111111111111,
}

let%entry other = (param: nat, storage) => {
  let t: option(PlusOne.instance) = Contract.at(storage.pl);
  let t = switch(t) {
    | None => Current.failwith()
    | Some(inst) => inst
  };
  let op = Contract.call(
    ~dest=t,
    ~amount=0tz,
    ~entry=main,
    ~parameter=param);
  ([op], storage);
};

let%entry main = ((), storage) => {
  let manager = Crypto.hash_key(storage.owner);
  let delegate = Some(manager);
  let spendable = false;
  let amount = Current.amount();
  let init_value: nat = 0;

  let (c_op, c_addr) =
    Contract.create(
      ~manager,
      ~delegate,
      ~spendable,
      ~delegatable=false,
      ~amount,
      ~storage={count: init_value, plus_owner: Contract.address(Contract.self())},
      (contract PlusOne),
    );

  let storage = storage.pl = c_addr;
  ([c_op], storage);
};

It makes me wonder if this will lead to endpoints that are like "order" and "pickup", ie a restaurant.